The North Carolina Medical Society supports the provision of services to dying patients in the most sensitive and humane manner under the circumstances. North Carolina's Right to a Natural Death Act recognizes a patient's right to a peaceful and natural death. It outlines an optional and nonexclusive procedure for respecting this right that provides a safe harbor of protection from liability in circumstances involving withholding or withdrawing extraordinary means of life support or artificial nutrition or hydration from an incompetent patient who is terminally and incurably ill, comatose or in a persistent vegetative state. The statute defines "extraordinary means" as "any medical procedure or intervention which in the judgment of the attending physician would serve only to postpone artificially the moment of death by sustaining, restoring, or supplanting a vital function." Since "extraordinary means" refers to "any medical procedure or intervention," it encompasses CPR in circumstances where the physician has determined that this intervention would serve only to postpone artificially the moment of death.
While these procedures are useful and recommended as a liability management device under appropriate circumstances, the Act also authorizes following the common law, and so doing may allow greater sensitivity to patient needs. The common law continues to grow through court decisions and addresses questions relative to the patient's right to control his or her medical care decisions and to die with dignity. While the statutory procedures are available, the physician has a degree of freedom in this area to use the often less stringent common law sensitively to mesh patient needs and rights with legal constraints. In addition to recognizing a Declaration for a Natural Death, North Carolina law further provides for a Health Care Power of Attorney and Portable Do Not Resuscitate Orders. Immunity protects persons and institutions that honor these documents in good faith.
The presence of a do not resuscitate (DNR) order or an order to limit, withhold or discontinue life-sustaining treatment does not relieve the physician of the responsibility to continue monitoring the condition of the patient, to provide all necessary symptomatic relief, and to write other orders consistent with the plan of care.
Should a conflict arise between and among the medical staff, the nursing staff and/or the patient's family regarding the issuance of a DNR order or other order to limit, withhold or discontinue life-sustaining treatment, the institution's ethics committee or other similar mechanism should be consulted to provide a forum for resolving the conflict.
General guidelines applicable to all "No Code Blue" or DNR orders: